Archives: viXra.org against arXiv.org

Independent geniuses such as Tony Smith, Jack Sarfatti, and many others who have penetrated much deeper to the "mainstream" have complained about the "censorship" - normally known as "quality control" and "peer review" - in the printed journals as well as Paul Ginsparg's arXiv.org.

Even seemingly conventional physicists such as Tommaso Dorigo have complained about the very existence of quality control.

Now, they have the opportunity they have always needed. Instead of arXiv.org, they may submit their papers to

viXra.org (click).

Yes, it is the same word backwards. The creator of viXra.org, Philip Gibbs, has stolen much of the technology and design from arXiv.org to create the illusion that it is the same thing. But if two people are doing the same thing, it is not always the same thing.

In the HEP section, there are so far four papers. One was written by Yuri Danoyan - who claims the everything in the Universe must come in the 3:1 ratio (three spatial dimensions per one time, three warm seasons for one winter, three women for one man, etc.). Tony Smith offers two new games in a town of surfer dudes. Finally, Barry Adams invents a new kind of electromagnetic U(1) specifically for neutrinos. ;-)

As you can see, the quality is excellent :-), and I urge all the critics of physics, self-described seers, their female and male disciples, all surfer dudes, and all foes of the quality control in science to join their friends and their true peers and to choose the new "uncensored" resource and get out of the world of actual scientists at last. We will see whether the old-fashioned "censored" or their new "uncensored" method to do science will lead to more convincing results.

If you don't know the answer is, it says that the elimination of wrong hypotheses is the #1 most essential procedure in the whole scientific method.

Via Physics World.